Philosophy & Theology

“The Bedouin and the Existence of Allah…”

The Bedouin and the Existence of Allah

Image 

Imam Ahmad Ibn Muhammad al-Maqqari al-Tilimsani al-Andalusi (d. 1041/1631) writes in Kitab Nafh al-Tib:

Arabic:

قيل لأعرابي بم عرفت ربك فقال البعرة تدل على البعير والروث يدل على الحمير وآثار الأقدام تدل على المسير فسماء ذات أبراج وبحار ذات أمواج أما يدل ذلك على العليم القدير

Translation:

“A Bedouin was asked: how do you know your Lord exists? He replied: “Camel dung indicates camels, donkey dung indicates donkeys and footprints indicate travel. So the sky, with its constellations and the seas with its waves, do not these indicate the All-Knowing, the All-Powerful?”[1]

Notes:

  • There are traces, marks or signatures that mark the existence of Allah.
  • The imprint of Allah is in his creation much like the designer and manufacture imprint (whether stylistic or numerical) on a specific product.
  • There are indications that the Creator Allah (swt) exists through evidence in His creation.
  • The Bedouin made a simple attestation to there being a design imprint of Allah in His creation much how tracks left behind in the desert sand indicates a desert traveller and animal excrements left behind by an animal indicates its presence. In other words, there is design in the world that bears the mark of a ‘Designer’.[2]

The Foolish fisherman Fallacy:

The Bedouin’s analogy is simple (conjured from his reality) but worth consideration. The simplicity of the analogy should not be a reason for the discerning seeker to undermine it as compelling. The existence of the Designer should not be discounted if it is based on the failure for the observer to comprehend design in the world. Doing it is to imitate the foolish fisherman who when unable to catch any fish, cries out that there are no fish in the water. Perhaps it is the fisherman who is inept. Therefore, denial of design in the world is actually a reflection of the inability of the observer to recognise and understand the design being the product of a Designer.

Thus, rejection of Allah’s existence is often down to denial of it not the irrationality of it.

And with Allah is success.

s.z.c.


[1] See al-Tilimsani, Nafh al-Tib min Ghusn al-Andalus al-Ratib (‘The Breath of Perfumes from the Boughs of Andalucía), vol.5, p.289.

[2] In Ibn Rushd’s taxonomy, this argument is thoroughly Qur’anic and is called the Argument from Creation (dalil-ikhtira`). See Faith and Reason in Islam: Averroes Exposition of Religious Arguments, [Al-Kashf ‘an Manahij al-Adilla fi `aqa’id al-Milla], tr. I. Najjar (Oxford, 2001), p.33. See C. S. Yaran, Islamic Thought on the Existence of God, pp.119-133 for basic surveys of the different arguments offered for the existence of God in Islamic thought.

4 thoughts on ““The Bedouin and the Existence of Allah…”

  1. Just know that this example doesn’t work on the modern atheists that live in the 21st century. I’m not saying that the argument is wrong, but the the reality is that Atheists are different now than what they used to be.

    Why doesn’t it work? Modern atheists demand scientific evidence. They will argue that We already have empirical evidence of what a camel dung looks like. The fact that you’re able to identify which animal the dung belongs to, is enough to prove that the given animal has walked by. If someone saw the dung and they didn’t know which animal it belonged to, they wouldn’t be able to tell you where exactly it came from. In the same way, there is no scientific evidence that shows that a tree, a planet, a galaxy is a “footprint” or “evidence” of God.

    This argument only works very good for modern atheists who do not strictly believe in scientism, or the “classical” atheists of the past. Because even if you didn’t know which animal left its dung there, you will still be able to come to the conclusion that SOMEONE left their dung there. In other words, even if you don’t know where the galaxies, trees, or planets came from, you can still deduce that some Creator caused it to happen.

Why not leave a Reply